Related Articles
Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, has sued the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over the alleged threat to arrest, detain, and prosecute him after his tenure as governor.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Mr Sanwo-Olu, through his lawyer, Darlington Ozurumba, filed the fundamental right enforcement suit before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of a Federal High Court in Abuja.
When the matter was called for mention on Tuesday, October 29, Mr Ozurumba informed the court that he had withdrawn the earlier originating summons filed and replaced it with a new one.
The lawyer said the anti-graft agency had been duly served with the latest court documents.
However, EFCC’s counsel, Hadiza Afegbua, said she had yet to see the documents.
Besides, the proof of service of the processes was not in the court file and Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter until November 11 for further mention.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that in the originating summons, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/773/2024 dated and filed on June 6, the governor raised seven questions and sought 11 reliefs.
Sanwo-Olu sought a declaration that under and by the provisions of Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution, “the plaintiff, as a citizen of Nigeria, is entitled to the right to private and family life as a minimum guarantee encapsulated under the Constitution of the Republic of Nigeria, 1999 before, during and after the occupation of a public office created by the Constitution.”
He wants the court to declare that under and by the provisions of Sections 43 and 44(1) of the 1999 Constitution, he is entitled to acquire, own, operate, and manage both moveable and immovable property.
This, he said, includes bank accounts, as a minimum guarantee encapsulated under the constitution either before, during, and after leaving the public office of governor of a state.
He also wants the court to declare that upon community reading of the provisions of Sections 35(1) & (4) and 41(1) of the constitution, the threat of his investigation, arrest, and detention by the EFCC during his tenure of office as governor is illegal.
He also said that the plan to arrest him was unconstitutional and a flagrant violation of his fundamental right to personal liberty and freedom of movement as guaranteed under Sections 35(1) & (4) and 41(1) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 ( as amended).
The governor prayed the court to declare that the incessant harassment, threat of arrest, and detention, against him upon the EFCC’s instigation by his political adversaries based on false and politically motivated allegations of corruption is a misuse of executive powers and abuse of public office.
He further wants the court to declare it as an unwarranted interference with his fundamental right to personal liberty, freedom of movement, fair hearing, and equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the constitution and the African Charter on Human & Peoples’ Rights, CAP A9 LFN 2004.
Mr Sanwo-Olu, therefore, sought an order restraining the EFCC from harassing, intimidating, arresting, detaining, interrogating, or prosecuting him in connection with his tenure as the governor of Lagos State.
He also prayed the court to make an order prohibiting and restraining the commission “from seizing the property, passport, and travel documents of the plaintiff or freezing the bank accounts of the plaintiff, his family members or in any other way to further breach the plaintiff’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution.”
He urged the court to make an order restraining the EFCC from inviting, arresting, or detaining him in connection with his tenure as governor of the state or breaching his fundamental rights to personal liberty, fair hearing, private and family life, freedom of movement, acquisition of moveable and immoveable property as enshrined in the laws.
In the affidavit in support of the originating summons deposed to by Martha Kanu, a litigation secretary in the law firm, the lawyer said she was informed of the facts by the governor at a teleconference meeting which she believed to be true.
She alleged that as a way of getting at the governor, the EFCC was now making a surreptitious plan to arrest some of his aides and family members based on the false and spurious allegations of diversion of funds.
She said the officials of the commission were now mounting pressure on some of the aides of the governor to come and make incriminating statements against him.
Kanu alleged that the anti-graft agency was also threatening to go after some contractors handling projects for the state government.
He said the agency was compelling them to come and make statements to implicate Mr. Sanwo-Olu of corruption as part of the orchestrated contrivance to build up a trump-up case against him.
According to her, in a malicious attempt to get at the plaintiff, some of the plaintiff’s political adversaries in conjunction with some of the officials of the defendant are falsely ascribing to his administration corrupt practices which are nonexistent.
She alleged that the EFCC, through some of its officials, was desperately inventing false, spurious, and malicious allegations against the governor to use as a basis for investigating, arresting, and prosecuting him after leaving office as governor.
