Kenya’s Apex court set to rule on disputed presidential election

Kenya’s Supreme Court is set to decide on whether to uphold or nullify the result of last month’s presidential election.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

A ruling anxiously awaited in a country scarred by previous bouts of poll-related violence.

The seven-member court said it would deliver its ruling at 12 p.m. local time (0900 GMT).

Opposition leader Raila Odinga, making his fifth presidential bid, says Deputy President William Ruto’s narrow win was the product of massive fraud.

Four out of seven election commissioners disowned the result announced by the commission chairman, saying the tallying had been opaque.

The Supreme Court made history in the last election in 2017 by annulling President Uhuru Kenyatta’s victory over Odinga because of procedural irregularities.

Kenyatta prevailed in a re-run that Odinga boycotted.

About 100 people were killed in election-related clashes that year.

This time, protests briefly broke out in several Odinga strongholds after the election commission chair declared Ruto the victor on Aug. 15, but Odinga urged supporters to stay peaceful and the streets have remained calm since.

 

Traffic in the capital Nairobi was lighter than usual on Monday morning.

Police had blocked off roads leading to the court and schools were closing early.

Odinga, who was backed by the term-limited Kenyatta in this election, has alleged that a team working for Ruto hacked into the commission’s system and replaced genuine pictures of polling station result forms with fake ones, increasing Ruto’s share.

“The evidence that has been presented by the petitioner shows a well orchestrated and fraudulent scheme that was executed with military precision,” Odinga’s lawyer, Philip Murgor said earlier.

Odinga and the four dissident commissioners also accuse commission chairman Wafula Chebukati of violating electoral law by unilaterally carrying out the vote tally and declaring the result.

The official numbers showed Ruto receiving 50.49 per cent, enough to avoid a second round run-off.

Ruto and Chebukati have rejected all of these allegations. Ruto’s legal team dismissed Odinga’s claims as a “shock and awe” strategy that lacks concrete evidence.

The court’s decision is final, if it nullifies the result, a new election must be organised within 60 days.

About CEZZATECH

https://www.cezzatech.com.ng/portfolio

Check Also

“Had the Supreme Court removed Kano Governor Abba Yusuf Galadima, Nigeria might have been on fire:

A chieftain of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), Buba Galadima had stated that Nigeria …

“Students are suspended by FGC Ijanikin after their parents filed a petition with the EFCC alleging financial malpractice:

The management of the Federal Government College, Ijanikin, Lagos State, has suspended three students indefinitely …

“Armed Forces Day: Former Senate President to FG: Enhance the welfare of military officers:

Former president of the Senate, Ahmad Lawan, has commended the federal government for its effort …

“The Supreme Court has deferred ruling on the Rivers guber appeal:

The Supreme Court on Monday reserved judgment in the appeal filed by the governorship candidate …

“Joseph Aloba, the late Mohbad’s father, states in the video: “I was shocked to learn that 26-year-old Mohbad left a will when 56-year-old me does not have one:

The will that Joseph Aloba, the late musician Ilerioluwa Aloba, also known as Mohbad, allegedly …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *